<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universal Release The Incredible Hulk: New International Trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20080515/universal-release-the-incredible-hulk-new-international-trailer-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20080515/universal-release-the-incredible-hulk-new-international-trailer-2/</link>
	<description>Gaming news and rumours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lt</title>
		<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20080515/universal-release-the-incredible-hulk-new-international-trailer-2/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>lt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/?p=2597#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>what the hell is a an natural green? an ugly green?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the hell is a an natural green? an ugly green?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Incredible Edible Egg</title>
		<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20080515/universal-release-the-incredible-hulk-new-international-trailer-2/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>The Incredible Edible Egg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/?p=2597#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>CGI is a must but not that company that they&#039;ve chosen. All the CGI charcters that they&#039;ve done look fake. The last Hulk looked fake because he was an ugly green, an unnatural green. They should have stuck with the same company. I hope that the movie is better then the trailers have been. I love the music. I just hope the CGI isn&#039;t that shitty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CGI is a must but not that company that they&#8217;ve chosen. All the CGI charcters that they&#8217;ve done look fake. The last Hulk looked fake because he was an ugly green, an unnatural green. They should have stuck with the same company. I hope that the movie is better then the trailers have been. I love the music. I just hope the CGI isn&#8217;t that shitty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backlash</title>
		<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20080515/universal-release-the-incredible-hulk-new-international-trailer-2/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>Backlash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/?p=2597#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>&quot;...why on earth could they not keep it like the original with a really muscle bound man playing the part of the Incredible Hulk, why did they have to spoil it with computer generated imagery?&quot;

They cannot use a really muscle-bound man because that quite simply is not the Hulk....it&#039;s not even the original one.  The 1970&#039;s Hulk portrayed by Lou Ferrigno was a design of necessity...nothing more. They didn&#039;t have the technology  at the time to portray the Hulk as he was in the books.  The &quot;original&quot; Hulk is a monster of superhuman size and strength...not a muscle-bound goof with green body paint and contact lenses.   

Any Internet  search of Hulk images will confirm this.  The Hulk cannot be done with anything other than CGI.  That being said....how EFFECTIVE the CGI we&#039;ve seen is certainly up for debate...

I tremendously respect and love the 70&#039;s TV show...and it&#039;s obvious the filmmakers of this film do too what with all the nods. But a guy in green paint will not cut it. 

That being said, I&#039;ll reserve judgment on this until I&#039;ve see the movie and not a three minute trailer. CGI I can forgive.....poor plot I cannot..and that&#039;s what matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;why on earth could they not keep it like the original with a really muscle bound man playing the part of the Incredible Hulk, why did they have to spoil it with computer generated imagery?&#8221;</p>
<p>They cannot use a really muscle-bound man because that quite simply is not the Hulk&#8230;.it&#8217;s not even the original one.  The 1970&#8242;s Hulk portrayed by Lou Ferrigno was a design of necessity&#8230;nothing more. They didn&#8217;t have the technology  at the time to portray the Hulk as he was in the books.  The &#8220;original&#8221; Hulk is a monster of superhuman size and strength&#8230;not a muscle-bound goof with green body paint and contact lenses.   </p>
<p>Any Internet  search of Hulk images will confirm this.  The Hulk cannot be done with anything other than CGI.  That being said&#8230;.how EFFECTIVE the CGI we&#8217;ve seen is certainly up for debate&#8230;</p>
<p>I tremendously respect and love the 70&#8242;s TV show&#8230;and it&#8217;s obvious the filmmakers of this film do too what with all the nods. But a guy in green paint will not cut it. </p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;ll reserve judgment on this until I&#8217;ve see the movie and not a three minute trailer. CGI I can forgive&#8230;..poor plot I cannot..and that&#8217;s what matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/8 queries in 0.038 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via static.inentertainment.co.uk

Served from: www.inentertainment.co.uk @ 2012-02-15 00:56:32 -->
