<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lindsay Lohan Pregnant: Baby Father Uncertain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20090512/lindsay-lohan-pregnant-baby-father-uncertain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20090512/lindsay-lohan-pregnant-baby-father-uncertain/</link>
	<description>Gaming news and rumours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendon courday</title>
		<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20090512/lindsay-lohan-pregnant-baby-father-uncertain/#comment-34897</link>
		<dc:creator>brendon courday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/?p=6083#comment-34897</guid>
		<description> i reckon its kinda true her being pregnant   maybe i know the father  but i am not telling  cause i hate having my pic in the news  i happen to know linds pretty well  so if she is preggy then its right  and i believe  she has gone to venice california for a break away from everyone  think it would do her good if she did have a kid might make her come to her senses  i guess  all i say is good luck to her  lets hope she will keep it  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> i reckon its kinda true her being pregnant   maybe i know the father  but i am not telling  cause i hate having my pic in the news  i happen to know linds pretty well  so if she is preggy then its right  and i believe  she has gone to venice california for a break away from everyone  think it would do her good if she did have a kid might make her come to her senses  i guess  all i say is good luck to her  lets hope she will keep it  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haylee</title>
		<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20090512/lindsay-lohan-pregnant-baby-father-uncertain/#comment-19780</link>
		<dc:creator>haylee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/?p=6083#comment-19780</guid>
		<description>toast is so good i love to eat it like a jelly head. and linsey lohan is a freak she&#039;s so weird and she&#039;s nasty this is my true opionon so stick that in your beer bottle linsey &amp;&amp; suck THAT!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>toast is so good i love to eat it like a jelly head. and linsey lohan is a freak she&#8217;s so weird and she&#8217;s nasty this is my true opionon so stick that in your beer bottle linsey &amp;&amp; suck THAT!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Lohan Pregnant</title>
		<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20090512/lindsay-lohan-pregnant-baby-father-uncertain/#comment-8609</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Lohan Pregnant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/?p=6083#comment-8609</guid>
		<description>Whether Lindsay Lohan pregnant or not. It’s not an issue I guess, she’s a woman… no other than. If you have the facts that the said rumor is true, just give me a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Lindsay Lohan pregnant or not. It’s not an issue I guess, she’s a woman… no other than. If you have the facts that the said rumor is true, just give me a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20090512/lindsay-lohan-pregnant-baby-father-uncertain/#comment-8586</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/?p=6083#comment-8586</guid>
		<description>----Does this have any origin in published plot descriptions for Lindsay&#039;s new  movie &quot;Labor Pains&quot; set to air on, last I heard, ABC Family in August (I think that&#039;s when)?   
----U know how that game of gossip goes where the message mutates as it passes thru a line of &quot;sources&quot;, resurfacing as a laughably twisted, many times unrecognizable version of what it started as, why it started, how it got 2 it&#039;s current version, &amp; even why whatever the original &quot;source&quot; by which the story/message was birthed (not an intended pun, yet the 2nd for me today in a Lindsay comment section that made me lol immediately after typing it) was said &amp; in what context.  
----It COULD originate out of a misinterpretation of half-read articles about the movie. Many of those article headers are purposely misleading to get readers to head to the site where the full article, with some exceptions, reveals what the dramatic headline really is referring to.  
  ----Or it could be true. I&#039;m inclined however to believe the plot of her upcoming film release to television has at least SOME connection to this latest &quot;mystery&quot; involving Lindsay. And Lord knows ppl will grab on2 any morsel that might be a Lohan scandal these days..many times printing b4 checking far enough into it 4 explanations or evidence in any direction. Once published, other media rehash the story sans anictdotal references in fear of being last on the &quot;scene&quot; or zealous desire to be one of the &quot;you heard it hear first&quot; news/blog hybrids to pop the story to Google &quot;News&quot; searchers such as me.  
 ----And gossip/news hybrid after gossip/news hybrid slowly feel safer in re-telling it via their site as the number of sites with which they can share/attribute the blame rise in number.  
---- It&#039;s currently an &quot;it&#039;s-being-reported-that..&quot; situation in which I&#039;ve yet to find any article indicate any active search for an actual origin to. Isn&#039;t getting to the bottom of a story the journalistic &quot;way&quot;?  ----WAKE UP, PPL...stalk the validity &amp; origins of this rumor &amp; provide some leads or something that shows us interest in journalistic integrity. You&#039;ll come out on top of the story whether you&#039;ve proved it true or discover the most laughable origin to it.   Just throw a witty headline on it &amp; you&#039;ll be quoted left &amp; right to the delight of ur increased server hits. 
 ---Jump on it &quot;journalists&quot; and you might find a resulting decrease in that title being attributed to you decorated with pseudo-disclaimer quotes holding it up like bookends...training wheels so-to-say, until u can ride the distinction of the title &#039;journalist&#039; minus the qoutes of uncertainty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;-Does this have any origin in published plot descriptions for Lindsay&#8217;s new  movie &#8220;Labor Pains&#8221; set to air on, last I heard, ABC Family in August (I think that&#8217;s when)?<br />
&#8212;-U know how that game of gossip goes where the message mutates as it passes thru a line of &#8220;sources&#8221;, resurfacing as a laughably twisted, many times unrecognizable version of what it started as, why it started, how it got 2 it&#8217;s current version, &amp; even why whatever the original &#8220;source&#8221; by which the story/message was birthed (not an intended pun, yet the 2nd for me today in a Lindsay comment section that made me lol immediately after typing it) was said &amp; in what context.<br />
&#8212;-It COULD originate out of a misinterpretation of half-read articles about the movie. Many of those article headers are purposely misleading to get readers to head to the site where the full article, with some exceptions, reveals what the dramatic headline really is referring to.<br />
  &#8212;-Or it could be true. I&#8217;m inclined however to believe the plot of her upcoming film release to television has at least SOME connection to this latest &#8220;mystery&#8221; involving Lindsay. And Lord knows ppl will grab on2 any morsel that might be a Lohan scandal these days..many times printing b4 checking far enough into it 4 explanations or evidence in any direction. Once published, other media rehash the story sans anictdotal references in fear of being last on the &#8220;scene&#8221; or zealous desire to be one of the &#8220;you heard it hear first&#8221; news/blog hybrids to pop the story to Google &#8220;News&#8221; searchers such as me.<br />
 &#8212;-And gossip/news hybrid after gossip/news hybrid slowly feel safer in re-telling it via their site as the number of sites with which they can share/attribute the blame rise in number.<br />
&#8212;- It&#8217;s currently an &#8220;it&#8217;s-being-reported-that..&#8221; situation in which I&#8217;ve yet to find any article indicate any active search for an actual origin to. Isn&#8217;t getting to the bottom of a story the journalistic &#8220;way&#8221;?  &#8212;-WAKE UP, PPL&#8230;stalk the validity &amp; origins of this rumor &amp; provide some leads or something that shows us interest in journalistic integrity. You&#8217;ll come out on top of the story whether you&#8217;ve proved it true or discover the most laughable origin to it.   Just throw a witty headline on it &amp; you&#8217;ll be quoted left &amp; right to the delight of ur increased server hits.<br />
 &#8212;Jump on it &#8220;journalists&#8221; and you might find a resulting decrease in that title being attributed to you decorated with pseudo-disclaimer quotes holding it up like bookends&#8230;training wheels so-to-say, until u can ride the distinction of the title &#8216;journalist&#8217; minus the qoutes of uncertainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.inentertainment.co.uk @ 2012-05-22 00:49:37 -->
