Michael Jackson’s Son May Have Same Skin Condition

There appears to be one big question on many people’s minds right now, and that is whether or not Michael Jackson’s older son Prince Michael has the very same rare skin condition that his father insisted that he had throughout his adult life.

According to Rosemary Black at nydailynews.com, when Prince Michael was seen wearing swimming trunks on a recent vacation in Hawaii, there were white patches of skin under his arm that were clearly visible. This of course has sparked the speculation.

Michael Jackson’s Son May Have Same Skin Condition

Michael Jackson said the condition Vitiligo was to blame for the gradual but steady lightening of his skin and with his 13-year old son showing similar symptoms; skeptics may now be convinced that Michael is in fact the biological father of the teen.

However, Dr. Doris Day – an attending dermatologist at Lenox Hill Hospital – said that Vitiligo, an autoimmune disease, is not necessarily an inherited disorder. “Getting vitiligo because a parent has it could happen, but it’s not necessarily a direct correlation,” she said.

You can read more of this story via the link above.

Remember to like us

  • Legacy3MJJ

    All of you headline seekers need to take this down. I'm surprised it took you all as long as it did to identify the clearly visible indicators on a child who was trying to vacation privately away from the public eye as it were during a difficult time in the first place. The photographer also should be ashamed for releasing the pictures. Michael tried to endure the ravages of his vitiligo in private, and every last one of you are ensuring that this 13-year-old child endures his as publicly as possible. Please don't hold up a child without his consent as the proof all of you doubters and hounds-of-scoops needed all along–that was your issue, your problem; not this child's. You all need to hang your heads in shame for judging Michael Jackson so harshly withOUT using his child publicly to alleviate doubts on an issue you clearly had no rights to proof for anyway on his father. As a parent, I would prefer you continue to doubt me than to use my child in this manner forcing him to deal with a clearly personal issue publicly. This is disgraceful.

  • jessi

    It is obvious the kid has vitiligo, now it is time to leave him and his siblings be!!!!
    I didn't need to see vitiligo on the kids skin.. to know Michael is their father., it is too sad that the kid has all over the body, not only under his arms, but neck and lower stomach