Anne Frank could have been betrayed by a Jewish notary who turned an informant for Nazi occupiers in an effort to save his family’s lives.
It has lengthy been theorized that the younger Jewish diarist and her household have been found by Gestapo officers in 1944 after a tip-off from an unknown informant however now a retired FBI agent believes he has provide you with the title of the person who revealed the place the Franks have been hiding: Arnold van den Bergh.
For the final six years, Vince Pankoke, who labored for the FBI for 30 years concentrating on Colombian drug cartels, has labored with a workforce of investigators and tried to attempt to crack the case utilizing trendy crime-solving methods. His findings have been aired on 60 Minutes on Sunday night time.
Alongside varied investigative methods, Pankoke and his workforce used synthetic intelligence to type by way of reams of knowledge and unique paperwork in an try to find who betrayed the Frank household in the end main a search workforce to their secret annex hidden behind a bookcase.
The investigation discovered Amsterdam businessman Arnold van den Bergh, pictured, revealed the place {the teenager} was hiding
Vince Pankoke believes he has solved the case as to who betrayed the Frank household and revealed their location after investigating for six years
The bookcase (left) hiding the doorway to the key annex which housed the household of Anne (proper) and different Jews in hiding
Pankoke and his workforce scanned native addressed and data to provide you with potential suspects, till they discovered the person they believed was accountable.
They consider van den Bergh could have been the informant – and astonishingly, that Anne’s father Otto Frank knew all about what he had finished.
Van den Bergh was a member of Amsterdam’s Jewish Council, arrange by the Nazis to supervise the Jewish populations they have been exterminating. Every council had entry to a full record of native Jewish individuals, with Dutch Jews’ faith recorded on their start data.
Pankoke and his workforce famous that Van den Bergh didn’t get despatched to a focus camp in direction of the tip of the battle, when the Nazis started to disband Jewish councils – and now consider he was capable of save his and his household’s lives by betraying different Jews. He died of unknown causes in London in 1950.
Anne stored a diary through the two years she was in hiding which was printed after the battle and turned her right into a globally acknowledged image of Holocaust victims.
She died within the Bergen-Belsen Nazi focus camp at age 15, shortly earlier than it was liberated by Allied forces.
Pankoke, collectively along with his workforce visited the hid rooms behind an Amsterdam warehouse the place the Frank household lived, within the seek for clues.
In trying to work out who tipped off the police to their location, investigators used commonplace regulation enforcement methods in analyzing varied suspects and used the essential ideas of ‘data, motive, alternative.’
Pankoke’s workforce included an investigative psychologist, a battle crimes investigator, historians, criminologists plus a number of archival researchers.
Pankoke, pictured proper, had a workforce which included an investigative psychologist, a battle crimes investigator, historians, criminologists plus a number of archival researchers
Anne Frank lived right here in Amsterdam and hid together with her dad and mom to flee from the Nazis between June 1942 and August 4, 1944
This picture taken in 1940 reveals Anne Frank on the age of 12 years, sitting at her desk on the Montessori faculty in Amsterdam. Frank’s celebrated WWII diary recounts her Jewish household’s hiding, arrest and deportation by the Nazis to Auschwitz the place she was gassed
A retired FBI agent paired up with a documentary maker from Holland to research who betrayed Anne Frank, pitured, and her household to the Nazis
Collectively, they set about addressing varied questions together with whether or not the particular person suspected of betraying them knew in regards to the location of the key annex.
They fed letters, maps, images and books into a man-made intelligence database that was developed particularly for the mission after which let the machine studying set to work the place it was capable of establish relationships between individuals, addresses that have been alike – and connections.
‘We needed to think about all these choices. The workforce and I sat down and we compiled an inventory of the way by which the annex might have been compromised. You recognize, was it carelessness of the individuals occupying the annex possibly making an excessive amount of noise or being seen within the home windows? You recognize, was it betrayal?’ Pankoke mentioned.
Then, Pankoke appeared on the potential motive behind the August 1944 reveal and whether or not the betrayer was anti-Semitic, or in the event that they did it for cash.
Pankoke’s investigators checked out about dozen potential suspects, every of which in flip was dominated out earlier than Arnold van den Bergh’s title was left standing.
The Jewish Council of Amsterdam was a physique arrange by the Nazis to have Jews oversee preparations for the extermination of their very own minority all through the Netherlands throughout World Warfare II. Arnold van den Bergh is seated fifth from left
Van den Bergh, was well-known Jewish businessman who lived in Amsterdam along with his spouse and kids.
‘We began a search. And we could not discover Arnold van den Bergh or any of his quick members of the family in these camps,’ Pankoke defined.
He was seemingly dwelling an open life regardless of being in the midst of Nazi-occupied Holland as Jewish individuals throughout him have been being taken away to focus camps.
Pankoke surmised that Van den Bergh will need to have had some type of safety and leverage with the Nazis.
‘Van den Bergh wasn’t deported,’ mentioned Dutch journalist Pieter van Twisk to CBS Information, who labored on the the investigative mission main the analysis workforce.
‘We went into the town archive and located proof that truly he was ‘Aryanized,’ so he misplaced his Jewish identification through the battle. That was fairly a feat. You could not simply do this.’
Anne’s father, Otto Frank acquired a letter after the battle particularly naming Van den Bergh because the prime suspect, pictured above
Otto Frank, pictured, by no means revealed the contents of the letter regardless of having a reputation of the one that could have betrayed him
There was additionally one other key piece of proof: a notice that Anne’s father, Otto Frank acquired after the battle, particularly named Van den Bergh because the prime suspect.
As a founding member of the Jewish Council, Van den Bergh had entry to an inventory of addresses the place Jews would have been hiding in Amsterdam.
As his leverage and protections stopping him from being hauled off to the camps was steadily whittled away, he knew he needed to give one thing of worth to the Nazis to ensure that him and his spouse to remain secure.
‘There is not any proof to point that he knew who was hiding at any of those addresses,’ explains Pankoke. ‘They have been simply addresses that have been supplied the place Jews have been recognized to have been in hiding.’
As to why Otto Frank didn’t come ahead with Van den Bergh’s title even years later, Pankoke has his theories.
Otto Frank is pictured along with his daughters Margot and Anne (sitting on his lap), circa 1931
For greater than two years the Frank household endured a clandestine life within the cramped quarters. However by August 1944 they have been daring to hope that the town would quickly be liberated by the Allies. Pictured, a photograph from a 1999 reconstruction, as seems on the Anne Frank Home web site. Anne and Fritz’s bed room
‘He [Otto] knew that Arnold van den Bergh was Jewish, and on this interval after the battle, antisemitism was nonetheless round. So maybe he simply felt that if I deliver this up once more, with Arnold van den Bergh being Jewish, it’s going to solely stoke the fires additional.’
Regardless of the deep dive into the virtually 80-year-old case and the figuring out of Van den Bergh as the one that betrayed them, the investigative workforce notes that the proof continues to be very a lot circumstantial within the case.
Nonetheless, Pankoke says that he believes the Franks who have been hiding within the annex have been positively betrayed and that it wasn’t merely a coincidence.
‘I feel that folks which might be this really feel, ‘Ah, possibly we will study one thing if this case is solved,” Pankoke mentioned.
‘And possibly to the Holocaust survivors which might be nonetheless on the market, they perceive that anyone nonetheless cares that these mysteries are solved.’
Pankoke admitted that his proof is circumstantial – and if it have been introduced earlier than a jury, can be unlikely to deliver a conviction.
However he believes his principle to be essentially the most believable one but, and is hopeful that information of the invention could shake free additional, beforehand hidden particulars of van den Bergh’s secrets and techniques.