A former member of the Defence Forces is in search of to have prices of being a member of Islamic State and financing terrorism dropped on the Particular Felony Courtroom.
Attorneys for Louth lady Lisa Smith, 39, have made an utility for the case in opposition to her to be dismissed.
It’s anticipated that they may argue there’s not enough proof to convict their consumer on any of the costs.
The case acquired widespread consideration in 2019 when it emerged that Smith, a former Air Corps soldier who had labored on the Authorities jet, had been detained in Syria over alleged hyperlinks to IS.
Ex-Defence Forces member Lisa Smith, 39, was on the Particular Felony Courtroom right now
Smith has been accused of being an Islamic State member and financing terrorism
Smith, a former Air Corps soldier who had labored on a Authorities jet, was detained in Syria
Smith was arrested at Dublin Airport in 2019 on suspicion of terrorist offences after coming back from Turkey in November together with her younger daughter.
She had travelled to Syria numerous years in the past after she transformed to Islam.
Smith is charged underneath Part Six of the Felony Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005 which makes it an offence to affix a overseas illegal organisation.
It’s alleged that between October 28, 2015 and December 1 2019 at a location outdoors the State, she was a member of a terrorist group styling itself because the Islamic State.
Smith is charged underneath Part Six of the Felony Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005
Attorneys for Smith sought to make an utility for the case to be dismissed on the grounds there’s not enough proof to convict her on any of the costs
She has additionally been accused of financing terrorism, by sending 800 euro in help by Western Union cash switch to a named particular person in 2015.
She has denied the costs.
The trial was scheduled to start on Tuesday, however the non-jury courtroom will first need to take care of pre-trial utility.
Attorneys for Smith sought to make an utility for the case to be dismissed on the grounds there’s not enough proof to convict her on any of the costs.
The three judges presiding over the case agreed to think about the appliance subsequent Monday.