Humberside Police officer, 24, who reported a colleague for sending her an express Snapchat is FIRED after mendacity to bosses about their relationship and failing to disclose he’d dumped her

  • Heather Spayne, 24, complained to skilled requirements in regards to the Snapchat
  • The volunteer particular sergeant of Humberside Police saved relationship a secret
  • The panel heard her actions may have led to her ex-boyfriend getting the sack










A policewoman who lied about her relationship with one other officer when he despatched her an express video has been fired.

Volunteer particular sergeant Heather Spayne, 24, of Humberside Police, complained to skilled requirements in regards to the Snapchat clip.

She saved their former relationship a secret when he was investigated, a misconduct listening to was instructed.

The panel heard her actions may have led to her ex – referred to solely as Officer G – getting the sack.

Volunteer special sergeant Heather Spayne, 24, of Humberside Police, complained to professional standards about the Snapchat clip (file photo)

Volunteer particular sergeant Heather Spayne, 24, of Humberside Police, complained to skilled requirements in regards to the Snapchat clip (file photograph)

Miss Spayne, who joined the Humberside drive in 2019, complained final Could after he despatched the video of himself.

There was an investigation during which Ms Spayne claimed that they have been ‘simply associates’.

Officer G stated the pair have been collectively for a number of months till Miss Spayne instructed him she was with another person.

Different officers stated the pair seemed to be romantically linked and had been seen kissing passionately on an evening out.

Ms Spayne, who didn’t attend the listening to, initially denied there was any relationship or that she had given Officer G that impression.

However messages to a different policeman referred to her having ‘been dumped’ by Officer G, the listening to was instructed.

When questioned by skilled requirements, Miss Spayne admitted she could have given Officer G a deceptive impression.

Natalie Wortley, who chaired the panel, stated her actions have been ‘deliberate and deliberate’ and will have ended the opposite officer’s profession.

She added she had proven no ‘real regret or perception’ and her actions had breached requirements {of professional} behaviour in respect of honesty and integrity.

Ms Spayne was discovered responsible of gross misconduct and dismissed with out discover.

Commercial