Judges can request that they are BANED from reporting on a transgender defendant’s past name. They may even be allowed to make secret appearances in court

  • The privacy rights of trans defendants must be protected in court. Guidance
  • The latest information for the judiciary is contained in the 540-page Equality Treatment Bench Book.
  • You can report bans for revealing your birth name and family history if required
  • In some cases, even witnesses might be required to use proper pronouns while giving evidence 










Judges are told they have the option to ban transgender defendants’ previous names from being reported or keep their court appearance secret.  

The Judicial College’s 540-page ‘Equal Treatment Bench Book’ advises courts not to use gendered pronouns and language where it is possible. It also provides guidance on how to deal with transgender issues in court. 

The document is produced by the Judicial College – responsible for training judges in county, Crown, and higher courts in England and Wales, and tribunal judges in England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

It states that a person’s ‘gender at birth or their transgender history’ should not be disclosed unless it is ‘necessary and relevant to the particular legal proceedings’.

It continues with the guidance: “In rare instances where it becomes necessary to reveal a person’s transgender and previous names, the court may consider setting reporting restrictions or conducting a private hearing to stop the release of such information.

According to the Bench Book, section 22 of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 prohibits any disclosure of protected information if a person applies for or has obtained a Gender Recognition Certificate. 

Although the act provides an exception for disclosures made in the course of proceeding before a tribunal or court, this exception “should be understood narrowly”, as the Bench Book says. 

Chair of the college and Appeal Court judge, Lady Justice King (pictured) said the guidance is a 'dynamic document' which has served as a key reference to courts

Lady Justice King, Chair of the College and Appeal Court Judge (pictured), said that the guidance was a “dynamic document” which serves as an important reference for courts.

The 'Equal Treatment Bench Book', a 540-page document produced by the Judicial College, advises courts to avoid using gendered language and pronouns where possible and lays out guidance for dealing with trans issues in court. It states that a person's 'gender at birth or their transgender history' should not be disclosed unless it is 'necessary and relevant to the particular legal proceedings'

The Judicial College produced the 540-page “Equal Treatment Bench Book” which advises courts to refrain from using gendered language, pronouns and pronouns wherever possible. It also provides guidelines for how courts should deal with trans issues. The book states that the disclosure of a person’s gender at birth and/or their transgender history should be avoided unless necessary or relevant to specific legal proceedings.

Judge criticizes victim’s refusal to refer to her trans attacker as “she” during court 

The victim of an attack was criticised by a judge for not calling her transgender attacker “she” in court.  

Tara Wolf (26) punched Maria MacLachlan (61) at Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park, 2017 during protests about transgender women’s rights.

She was ordered to pay £430 in fines and costs after a judge declared the language of the transgender debate ‘antagonistic to say the least’. 

Ms MacLachlan, who describes herself as a ‘gender critical feminist’, had her £120 Panasonic camera knocked out of her hand by hooded Wolf, who identifies as female.

Wolf stated that she was afraid any video of Wolf would be used as evidence to identify her transgender identity and took self-defense measures.

Hendon Magistrates found her guilty.  

In April 2018, District Judge Kenneth Grant gave his verdict. He called Miss MacLachlan unfaithful because she did not refer to Wolf by the name of’she” during the two-day trial.

He replied, “When Miss MacLachlan asked me to refer to defendant as she was she, she responded with terrible grace.

She continued to call Miss Wolf he and he after I asked her.

“The language used in the debate is antagonistic, hostile.”

Wolf had admitted before attending the rally she had posted on a Facebook event page: ‘I want to f**k up some TERFS [Trans-Exterminatory Radical Feminists]They are not better than FASH. [Fascists]’.

Wolf, from Stratford, east London denied assault by beating, but was found guilty by Hendon Magistrates and ordered to pay a £150 fine, a victim surcharge of £30, and pay prosecution costs of £250. 

Its latest revision also advises courts to avoid using gendered language and pronouns where possible, The Times reports.

 It also raises the scenario of an offender who has changed gender and their right to be referred to in court using their preferred pronoun.

This guidance states: “There might be circumstances where the rights to refer to a Trans person using pronouns matching their gender assign at birth, or otherly revealing a person’s trans status, conflict with the trans person’s right to privacy.” 

The court stated that in rare cases where disclosures of a person’s transgender history or previous names are necessary, it may be possible for the court to impose reporting restrictions.

Lady Justice King is the chair of the college, and an Appeal Court judge. She said that the guidance has been used as a key reference by courts. They have been ‘admired’ and ‘encouraged’ around the world.   

There are several suggestions by the college for neutral language. The college recommends that judges use the term “flight attendant” instead of “air hostess”, and “chair” instead of “chairman”. 

“It’s important to respect someone’s gender identity through appropriate terms and addresses, names and pronouns. Everybody has the right of respect for their private and gender identities, as well as personal dignity’, it states.

It also said that the term “queer” is quickly becoming accepted as an umbrella term to describe those who aren’t narrowly heterosexual or not cisgender, i.e. they identify with their birth gender.

Stonewall states that queer is a term used to describe young people, especially those who are not identified with the traditional gender identification categories. 

“It is also associated with various cultural movements and arts around the world and has even entered academic discourse.

‘Nevertheless [the term queer]It is considered to be derogatory by certain LGBT people, so it should not be used’.

The college said that in criminal cases involving violence against women, they objected to the use of the word ‘victim’ because it could imply helplessness and passivity. Some prefer to use the term’survivor’, which conveys resilience. 

Advertisement