Sir Keir Starmer as we speak accused Dominic Raab of ‘whining’ in regards to the bullying probe that pressured him to stop as Deputy Prime Minister.

The Labour chief hit out after Mr Raab, who was additionally Justice Secretary, used his resignation letter to recommend civil servants weren’t in a position to hack his excessive requirements.

As Rishi Sunak misplaced a 3rd Cupboard minister inside his first six months as Prime Minister, Sir Keir labelled the PM ‘weak’ for failing to sack Mr Raab earlier than he stop.

He claimed sturdy management had been ‘palpably absent’ from Mr Sunak, who had spent a day deliberating over the contents of a prime barrister’s report about Mr Raab’s behaviour in the direction of officers.

The departure of Mr Raab left Tory MPs questioning whether or not different prime ministers would now face complaints from civil servants, with one suggesting the findings in opposition to the departing Deputy PM might have been ‘flimsy’.

One other mentioned an allegation made by Mr Raab in regards to the actions of an unnamed senior diplomat, included in his resignation letter, was ‘troubling’.

Sir Keir Starmer accused Dominic Raab of 'whining' about the bullying probe that forced him to quit as Deputy Prime Minister

Sir Keir Starmer accused Dominic Raab of ‘whining’ in regards to the bullying probe that pressured him to stop as Deputy Prime Minister

Mr Raab this morning wrote to Rishi Sunak to reveal he was quitting as Deputy PM and Justice Secretary

Mr Raab this morning wrote to Rishi Sunak to disclose he was quitting as Deputy PM and Justice Secretary

In full: Dominic Raab’s resignation letter to Rishi Sunak 

Expensive Prime Minister,

I’m writing to resign out of your authorities, following the receipt of the report arising from the inquiry performed by Adam Tolley KC.

I known as for the inquiry and undertook to resign, if it made any discovering of bullying in anyway. I imagine it is very important preserve my phrase.

It has been a privilege to serve you as Deputy Prime Minister, Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor.

I’m grateful to have had the chance to work as a minister in a spread of roles and departments since 2015, and pay tribute to the various excellent civil servants with whom I’ve labored.

While I really feel obligation certain to just accept the end result of the inquiry, it dismissed all however two of the claims levelled in opposition to me.

I additionally imagine that its two hostile findings are flawed and set a harmful precedent for the conduct of fine authorities.

First, ministers should be capable of train direct oversight with respect to senior officers over vital negotiations performed on behalf of the British folks, in any other case the democratic and constitutional precept of ministerial duty can be misplaced.

This was significantly true throughout my time as international secretary, within the context of the Brexit negotiations over Gibraltar, when a senior diplomat breached the mandate agreed by Cupboard.

Second, ministers should be capable of give direct vital suggestions on briefings and submissions to senior officers, in an effort to set the requirements and drive the reform the general public anticipate of us.

After all, this should be accomplished inside cheap bounds. Mr Tolley concluded that I had not as soon as, in four-and-a-half years, sworn or shouted at anybody, not to mention thrown something or in any other case bodily intimidated anybody, nore deliberately sought to belittle anybody.

I’m genuinely sorry for any unintended stress or offence that any officers felt, on account of the tempo, requirements and problem that I dropped at the Ministry of Justice. That’s, nevertheless, what the general public anticipate of ministers engaged on their behalf.

In setting the edge for bullying so low, this inquiry has set a harmful precedent.

It’s going to encourage spurious complaints in opposition to ministers, and have a chilling impact on these driving change on behalf of your authorities – and in the end the British folks.

Lastly, I raised with you a variety of improprieties that got here to mild through the course of this inquiry.

They embrace the systematic leaking of skewed and fabricated claims to the media in breach of the principles of the inquiry and the civil service code of conduct, and the coercive removing by a senior official of devoted personal secretaries from my Ministry of Justice personal workplace, in October of final 12 months.

I hope these can be independently reviewed.

I stay as supportive of you and this Authorities as once I first launched you at your marketing campaign management launch final July.

You will have proved an important Prime Minister in very difficult instances, and you’ll depend on my help from the backbenches.

Yours sincerely,

Dominic Raab

Mr Raab this morning wrote to Mr Sunak to disclose he was quitting as Deputy PM and Justice Secretary.

He acknowledged {that a} months-long investigation by Adam Tolley KC had upheld two of the complaints made in opposition to him.

However Mr Raab blasted Mr Tolley’s report for ‘setting the edge for bullying so low’ and claimed a ‘harmful precedent’ had been set.

He steered it could ‘encourage spurious complaints’ in opposition to ministers and have a ‘chilling impact’ throughout Whitehall.

Mr Raab steered officers who labored beneath him on the Ministry of Justice had been unable to maintain up with the ‘tempo, requirements and problem’ that he demanded.

In response to Mr Raab’s resignation, Sir Keir claimed it confirmed the ‘continuous weak point’ of Mr Sunak.

‘He ought to by no means have appointed him within the first place, together with different members of the Cupboard that should not have been appointed, after which he did not sack him,’ the Labour chief mentioned.

‘Even as we speak, it is Raab who resigned relatively than the PM who acts.’

Sir Keir additionally took a swipe on the contents of Mr Raab’s resignation letter, including: ‘I do not know why Dominic Raab, in the course of a cost-of-living disaster, thinks that anyone needs to listen to about his whining about having to resign.

‘What I believe everyone needs is robust management and that has been palpably absent right here.’

However there have been indicators that Tory MPs had been involved about Mr Tolley’s conclusions about Mr Raab’s behaviour.

One former Cupboard minister informed MailOnline they had been ready to see Mr Tolley’s full report earlier than taking a view, however mentioned Mr Raab’s letter indicated the KC’s findings ‘could also be flimsy’.

One other Tory MP mentioned an allegation made by Mr Raab, {that a} ‘senior diplomat breached the mandate agreed by Cupboard’ throughout Brexit negotiation about Gibraltar, was ‘troubling’.

Conservative backbencher Philip Davies steered the findings in opposition to Mr Raab may ‘result in a spate of different complaints getting into about different ministers’.

He informed GB Information: ‘I simply marvel how a lot this can be seen as a watershed second by way of how ministers can truly govern, how ministers deal with civil servants and whether or not or not Dominic Raab is true in what he says in that the edge for bullying has been set so low.

‘I wonder if or not this might result in a spate of different complaints getting into about different ministers.

‘As a result of I believe that if the edge has been set so low there can be different examples on the market as nicely.’

Esther McVey, a former work and pensions secretary, steered consideration may now give attention to ex-Cupboard minister Sir Alok Sharma, who has additionally confronted latest bullying allegations. 

She mentioned: ‘There have been reviews final week about Alok Sharma, that he was calling up workers who we hadn’t beforehand warned, unannounced, he was calling up workers who had been working at dwelling.

‘They had been saying they discovered this as a type of bullying, so already Alok Sharma is beneath the highlight, one other Cupboard minister.’

Sir Alok, who was president of the Cop-26 cliate summit, has denied allegations he ‘bullied’ civil servants.

He mentioned: ‘I’ve by no means been made conscious of any “casual complaints” or in any other case from workers.

‘The Cupboard Workplace has confirmed that there are not any data of any casual or formal complaints throughout authorities about me.

‘I refute strongly these allegations.’