Not ONE migrant has been despatched again to France below post-Brexit guidelines, new figures present, regardless of 70,000 crossing the Channel since final January

  • No asylum seekers forcibly returned to France below post-Brexit border guidelines
  • Since January final 12 months solely 21 ‘enforced removals’ carried out, none to France
  • Solely 83 asylum seekers had been advised one other nation is chargeable for their declare

No asylum seekers have been forcibly returned to France below post-Brexit border guidelines, official figures confirmed final evening.

Since January final 12 months solely 21 ‘enforced removals’ have been carried out towards claimants who travelled by means of a secure nation to Britain. None has been eliminated to France, despite the fact that 70,000 have crossed the Channel by small boat over this time.

The 21 returns had been made to Germany, Eire, Italy, Slovenia, Spain, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland.

The House Workplace launched guidelines to permit asylum instances to be declared ‘inadmissible’ if candidates had a reference to a secure third nation, together with passing by means of one other state on the way in which right here. 

Between these measures coming into pressure in January 2021 and September this 12 months, greater than 20,600 asylum claims had been thought-about. 

No asylum seekers have been forcibly returned to France below post-Brexit border guidelines, official figures confirmed final evening

However solely 83 asylum seekers had been issued with ‘inadmissibility choices’ – that means one other nation was ‘thought-about to be chargeable for the declare’.

The measures depend on different international locations agreeing to simply accept the asylum seekers again and solely 21 instances have led to deportations.

Just below 9,800 instances had been ultimately put again into the asylum queue to have their instances thought-about. 

The tiny variety of removals will increase recent doubts over the Authorities’s suggestion that it may well deal with the Channel disaster by declaring claims inadmissible.

The tiny number of removals will raise fresh doubts over the Government's suggestion that it can address the Channel crisis by declaring claims inadmissible

The tiny variety of removals will increase recent doubts over the Authorities’s suggestion that it may well deal with the Channel disaster by declaring claims inadmissible

The regime for coping with inadmissible claims was launched on the finish of the Brexit transition interval. 

It was meant to interchange a European Union scheme – referred to as the ‘Dublin Regulation’ – which permits asylum seekers who go by means of one other EU nation to be despatched again there, decreasing so-called ‘asylum purchasing’.

Earlier this 12 months the then residence secretary Priti Patel took steps to bolster the inadmissibility powers by enshrining them in main laws.

The Nationality and Borders Act 2022 permits the House Workplace to declare an asylum software ‘inadmissible’ if the claimant has a hyperlink with a ‘secure third nation’. Nonetheless, it did permit exceptions, together with on human rights grounds.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman (pictured on Wednesday) last month vowed to 'move heaven and earth' to tighten the law yet further, effectively barring anyone who crosses the Channel by small boat from claiming asylum

House Secretary Suella Braverman (pictured on Wednesday) final month vowed to ‘transfer heaven and earth’ to tighten the regulation but additional, successfully barring anybody who crosses the Channel by small boat from claiming asylum

The most recent figures counsel even the strengthening of the regulation, which got here into pressure on June 28, has did not have an effect on the variety of ineligible asylum seekers who’re faraway from the UK.

House Secretary Suella Braverman final month vowed to ‘transfer heaven and earth’ to tighten the regulation but additional, successfully barring anybody who crosses the Channel by small boat from claiming asylum. Her plans haven’t been revealed.

This week she advised MPs that publication of an immigration Invoice that had been deliberate initially by the tip of subsequent month would possibly now ‘slip’ into the brand new 12 months.

The Mail reported yesterday that the asylum backlog has soared by greater than 21,000 in three months to 148,533. Of these, 143,377 instances had been awaiting an preliminary determination, and greater than 5,000 had been ‘pending assessment’. Three years in the past the whole stood at simply 48,000.

  •  A crackdown on international college students dangers many universities going bust, a authorities adviser warned yesterday. Professor Brian Bell, who chairs the migration advisory committee, mentioned: ‘Most universities for many programs lose cash on educating British college students and offset that loss by charging extra for worldwide college students.’ The Authorities is contemplating restrictions on worldwide college students bringing dependants into the nation after internet migration soared.

Commercial