Jamie Powdrill has now been dismissed for gross misconduct
A police officer who attacked a girl in her personal mattress and refused to let her go away the home in a horrific marketing campaign of home abuse has been dismissed for gross misconduct.
Jamie Powdrill, an officer with Humberside Police for 18 years, rose to a place of accountability as a tutor constable – which he used to coerce and management his relationships with two pupil officers.
He additionally exhibited comparable behaviour throughout a relationship with an ambulance technician, whom he subjected to undesirable, coercive and controlling behaviour throughout a 17-month interval.
Powdrill has now been dismissed from the power for gross misconduct after the ladies got here ahead to testify in opposition to him throughout a listening to in December.
The listening to was advised that Powdrill was in a relationship with a girl recognized solely as A, who was an ambulance technician he had met by means of his work.
The panel was advised that he bodily prevented her leaving his tackle to attend work and bodily assaulted her while she was in mattress following an evening shift.
The listening to was additionally advised that Powdrill engaged in a relationship with one other lady, referred to as PC B, who was a trainee officer to whom he was offering assist and recommendation as a extra senior officer.
In an identical sample, he subjected her to undesirable, controlling and coercive behaviour over three months.
Powdrill was in a position to strike once more, when he caught up a relationship with PC C, who was additionally a pupil officer.
Jamie Powdrill, an officer with Humberside Police for 18 years, rose to a place of accountability as a tutor constable – which he used to coerce and management his relationships with two pupil officers (pictured: Humberside Police headquarters)
Over two months, he subjected her to the identical abusive behaviour, bodily injuring her within the course of.
The panel discovered the Powdrill’s conduct breached the Requirements of Skilled Behaviour regarding Discreditable Conduct and amounted to gross misconduct.
In conclusion, the listening to’s panel wrote: ‘The panel decided that the officer was solely chargeable for his actions, he abused his place as a tutor constable, two of his victims had been pupil officers, and he was a perpetrator of home abuse spanning quite a lot of years.
‘The panel had been glad that the three girls had been all harmed by his behaviour which was sustained and repeated over a big time period.
‘There have been quite a lot of aggravating components, together with the vulnerability of the ladies, the variety of victims of the officer’s behaviour, and that misogyny within the police is a nationwide concern.
‘There was a scarcity of real regret, perception or acceptance of accountability of the impression of his behaviour, and the panel famous that the style by which his case was carried out added to the misery of his victims.
‘The panel discovered the allegations amounted to gross misconduct and rapid dismissal the suitable sanction.
‘No lesser sanction would serve the aim of sustaining public confidence in and the popularity of the police service, uphold excessive requirements of policing and deter misconduct and shield the general public.’