A instructor who was hailed as a hero for tackling a crazed knifeman has now been banned from the classroom for all times after filming a 16-year-old woman’s bottom on his cellphone.

David Stus, 41, had been given a police commendation for his bravery at Ridgewood Excessive Faculty in Stourbridge, West Midlands, the place he helped overpower a teen who stabbed 14-year-old Chloe West 9 instances in April 2011.

Chloe survived the devastating injures brought about on the faculty gates by 18-year-old stalker ex boyfriend Samuel Gayzer-Tomlinson, who was tackled by three members of employees – together with Stus – whereas two Yr 11 pupils knocked the knife from his fingers.

Gayzer-Tomlinson was jailed for 13 years for tried homicide and Stus, who sat on him till the police arrived, continued to show on the faculty.   

However in April 2019, three movies got here to gentle of a 16-year-old woman which have been filmed on Bonfire Evening at expertise instructor Stus’s residence tackle – which {the teenager} had visited to gather a barbecue to make use of that night.

The woman, known as Youngster A, could possibly be seen transferring objects from a automotive and across the property, and it appeared that when she was bending over to choose up or put down an merchandise, the digital camera was targeted on her backside.

Police have been contacted and took no additional motion following a legal investigation, however the faculty started its personal probe and made a referral to educating watchdogs. 

Stus has now been banned from educating for all times following a misconduct listening to in Coventry.

David Stus, 41, had been given a police commendation for his bravery at Ridgewood High School (pictured) in Stourbridge, West Midlands, where he helped overpower a teenager who stabbed 14-year-old Chloe West nine times in April 2011

David Stus, 41, had been given a police commendation for his bravery at Ridgewood Excessive Faculty (pictured) in Stourbridge, West Midlands, the place he helped overpower a teen who stabbed 14-year-old Chloe West 9 instances in April 2011

The Educating Regulation Company panel stated Youngster A had visited Mr Stus’s residence tackle on Bonfire Evening to be able to choose up a barbecue to make use of that night. 

Stus had again ache and Youngster A assisted in transferring some heavy objects from a automotive and across the property.

In some unspecified time in the future through the footage, the digital camera turned and the individual holding the cellphone could possibly be seen to be Stus. A muffled dialog could possibly be heard between the 2 of them at instances.

Among the footage had been edited, in order that when Youngster A was bent over, the footage looped on repeat. 

Stus claimed the unique footage on his cellphone was deleted. He accepted that he will need to have recorded the video, nevertheless it was unintentional.

David Stus, 41, had been given a police commendation for his bravery at Ridgewood High School in Stourbridge, West Midlands, where he helped overpower a teenager who stabbed 14-year-old Chloe West (pictured) nine times in April 2011

David Stus, 41, had been given a police commendation for his bravery at Ridgewood Excessive Faculty in Stourbridge, West Midlands, the place he helped overpower a teen who stabbed 14-year-old Chloe West (pictured) 9 instances in April 2011

He argued he typically had his cellphone set to document on account of issues with neighbouring properties and that usually he was not excellent with telephones.

He stated that he typically inadvertently recorded footage by chance, made pocket dials and had damaged or misplaced many different telephones.

However the panel which seen the movie stated at some factors, Youngster A seemed to be within the centre of the footage.

The TRA stated: ‘One clip confirmed Youngster A choosing up an merchandise, with a close-up of her backside. Mr Stus stays behind Youngster A and follows her as she walks to the kitchen.

‘Aside from a quick second at 0:10, the footage stays centred on Youngster A’s rear for the whole lot of that point interval.

‘For the overwhelming majority of this era the footage isn’t shaky and it doesn’t deviate from a view of Youngster A from behind.’

Youngster A gave proof that she was not conscious of being filmed and due to this fact didn’t consent. This was not disputed by the instructor.

Chloe survived the devastating injures caused at the school gates by 18-year-old stalker ex boyfriend Samuel Gayzer-Tomlinson (pictured), who was tackled by three members of staff - including Stus - while two Year 11 pupils knocked the knife from his hands

Tomlinson had dyed his hair black so she wouldn't recognise him

Chloe survived the devastating injures brought about on the faculty gates by 18-year-old stalker ex boyfriend Samuel Gayzer-Tomlinson (pictured), who was tackled by three members of employees – together with Stus – whereas two Yr 11 pupils knocked the knife from his fingers. Tomlinson had dyed his hair black so she would not recognise him

One clip seems to point out elements of the footage of Youngster A being looped, notably when she is bent over, though the panel stated there was not sufficient proof the instructor had edited it. 

Chris Ruston, who chaired the misconduct listening to in Coventry, stated: ‘The panel thought-about the one pure clarification for covertly filming Youngster A from behind and specializing in her backside could be for his personal sexual gratification.

‘As such, the panel is happy that it’s extra doubtless than not that Mr Stus’s actions have been sexually motivated.’

Banning Stus from educating for all times, John Knowles, for the Training Secretary, stated: ‘The panel famous that the allegations befell outdoors the training setting.

‘However they thought-about that as Mr Stus’s sexually motivated misconduct concerned a baby, it might have an effect on the best way he fulfilled his educating position or might result in pupils being uncovered to, or influenced by his behaviour in a dangerous approach.

‘Accordingly, the panel was happy that Mr Stus was responsible of unacceptable skilled conduct.

‘The panel additionally took under consideration that Mr Stus had beforehand been concerned in an especially severe incident on the faculty and had acted heroically following a knife assault and obtained a police commendation.’