Tony Hetherington is Monetary Mail on Sunday’s ace investigator, combating readers corners, revealing the reality that lies behind closed doorways and profitable victories for many who have been left out-of-pocket. Learn how to contact him under. 

Mystery: RBS looked in the wrong place but finally the £2,000 was returned

Thriller: RBS seemed within the improper place however lastly the £2,000 was returned

Ms L.S. writes: I despatched £2,000 from my Lloyds account to an account on the Royal Financial institution of Scotland, however I mistyped one digit of the RBS type code.

I realised this the following day and knowledgeable Lloyds, and after I contacted the Ombudsman, Lloyds tried to recuperate my cash. Nonetheless, RBS responded months later, saying the RBS account had been closed since 2015 so it had returned the cash to Lloyds. 

Regardless of this, Lloyds says my cash continues to be with RBS. We’d like this cash badly. 

Tony Hetherington replies: The unique mistake was yours, and Lloyds Financial institution did question the type code and account quantity if you made the switch, however you may have spent months since then, making an attempt with out success to seek out out the place your £2,000 went. Your personal financial institution, Lloyds, has even paid you £50 twice, after accepting that on two events it didn’t transfer rapidly sufficient in your behalf, and the Ombudsman authorised these funds. 

The foremost stumbling block all alongside has been RBS’s insistence that you simply despatched your cash to an account which not existed, so I requested officers at NatWest Group – RBS’s mum or dad firm – to take one other take a look at this.

They got here again to me with a solution that was simply as puzzling, saying that they had discovered a £2,000 cost from you on the date in query, however it had gone via and not using a hitch. 

In the meantime, including to an more and more confused image, your personal financial institution had been contacted by Yorkshire Water, asking Lloyds to elucidate an sudden £2,000 that had popped up within the water firm’s account. 

This made even much less sense when NatWest Group advised me the £2,000 had gone to a private account and never a enterprise account. 

And no matter occurred to the suggestion that the cash had gone to a useless account that was closed in 2015 and that it had been returned to Lloyds? 

After I mentioned this with you, issues grew to become just a little clearer. The £2,000 was to assist your daughter whose central heating boiler had failed. When the primary £2,000 vanished into the banking system, fairly than let her down, you paid yet again. 

What NatWest Group had discovered and reported to me was your second cost; the primary £2,000 was nonetheless lacking. After which, out of the blue, Yorkshire Water re-entered the image and returned the lacking £2,000 to your account at Lloyds. 

It had been sitting within the water firm’s NatWest Group holding account, not allotted to any of its clients as a result of, after all, it had solely gone there by chance. 

NatWest Group and RBS had been wanting within the improper place, concentrating on the £2,000 that you simply had efficiently transferred, and never on the preliminary £2,000 that had gone to Yorkshire Water whose account was one digit completely different. 

Reliance on type codes and account numbers is clearly useful to the banks, however unhealthy experiences like yours present that making a single slip is as straightforward as mis-dialling a cellphone quantity – however much more costly and much tougher to place proper. 

Why is Halifax refusing to just accept my shares?

B.H. writes: I’ve been utilizing Halifax Share Dealing for over 20 years. I learn with curiosity about Primarybid’s service, and I utilized efficiently for shares in Draper Esprit plc. 

Nonetheless, Primarybid then advised me that Halifax refused to just accept the shares into my portfolio. 

The Halifax web site says nothing about why it will reject shares acquired by way of Primarybid, so I rang and after 90 minutes in a queue, Halifax merely advised me that its supplier didn’t wish to take care of them. 

Refusal: The Halifax website says nothing about why it would reject shares acquired via Primarybid

Refusal: The Halifax web site says nothing about why it will reject shares acquired by way of Primarybid

Tony Hetherington replies: Primarybid is a helpful service that permits extraordinary buyers entry to Preliminary Public Choices, fairly than these IPOs being the privileged province of the massive monetary establishments. 

You used it to use efficiently for shares in Draper Esprit (just lately renamed Molten Ventures), a enterprise capital agency that invests in expertise firms. Usually, your shares can be handed to your dealer, however Halifax Share Dealing wouldn’t settle for them. Employees there inform me that this was not as a result of Halifax has a blanket ban on shares purchased via Primarybid. The issue was with Draper Esprit itself. 

Halifax’s share dealing arm is meant for extraordinary buyers to commerce in shares which might be simply and freely purchased and bought. However when Halifax checked out Draper Esprit’s personal paperwork, it warned that typical buyers have been anticipated to be skilled merchants, establishments, buyers with skilled advisers, or individuals rich sufficient to threat a whole loss. 

Since Halifax was by no means supposed for this, I can’t criticise its resolution. You could have reached the identical conclusion and have advised me you may have now switched to a special dealer that may settle for your shares. 

In case you imagine you’re the sufferer of monetary wrongdoing, write to Tony Hetherington at Monetary Mail, 2 Derry Road, London W8 5TS or electronic mail Due to the excessive quantity of enquiries, private replies can’t be given. Please ship solely copies of unique paperwork, which we remorse can’t be returned. 

Some hyperlinks on this article could also be affiliate hyperlinks. In case you click on on them we might earn a small fee. That helps us fund This Is Cash, and preserve it free to make use of. We don’t write articles to advertise merchandise. We don’t enable any business relationship to have an effect on our editorial independence.