Dozens of Tories are poised to rebel today against Boris Johnson’s plan to make elderly care reforms less generous.

Yesterday, a former cabinet minister said he will vote against an amendment which would make less-eligible pensioners pay more. A Red Wall MP cautioned the Prime Minister to not take his support as a given.

Many more MPs were last night considering whether to break the party whip for the first time and waiting to see if ministers offered last-minute concessions to the proposals, which have been dubbed an ‘inheritance tax on the North’.

Dozens of Tories are set to rebel against Boris Johnson¿s plan to make elderly care reforms less generous today

Dozens of Tories are set to rebel against Boris Johnson’s plan to make elderly care reforms less generous today

They are not only afraid of backlash from constituents if the Government is supported, but they also fear that the Government may force them to make a U-turn again like it did over the Owen Paterson scandal.

The row centres on the long-promised lifetime cap, which was announced in September and which will mean pensioners never have to pay more than £86,000 in care costs.

It was thought that council care costs for poorer residents would count toward the limit. However, small print from last week proved otherwise.

The change means that elderly people will have to keep paying their own way for much longer before they hit this ceiling, and it will disproportionately affect voters in the North and Midlands that were vital to the Tories’ 2019 election victory, whose houses are worth less than those in the South.

Anyone with a home worth less than £186,000 will be hit with higher care costs under the proposals, analysis carried out by Labour suggests.

Labour estimates that the North of England has an average value of about £75,000, with 107 constituencies in the North, and no in London or South East.

By contrast, pensioners with homes worth more than £186,000 will be unaffected.

Robert Buckland was an ex-justice secretary and became the Tory first MP to say he would vote against today’s Government.

He told LBC radio: ‘The Government must look again at this. I think it’s far better to actually publish the social care White Paper first so that we can see what the new proposals are – what is the system that we’re going to be funding?’

Asked if other Tory MPs shared his view, he replied: ‘I think there’s a lot of concern out there about this issue and I know that the Government is listening to those concerns.’

Christian Wakeford, who took Bury South for the Conservatives at the last election, told Times Radio: ‘What I wanted to see was a plan, and it feels like we didn’t have one then and I’m not fully sure we’ve got one now.

‘But then to move the goalposts after we’ve already introduced this, it’s not something I’m particularly comfortable with, especially when one of the main messages for introducing this levy was you won’t need to sell your house for care.’

Asked if he would vote against it, he replied: ‘It shouldn’t be taken for granted that we’re just going to walk through the same lobby.’

Another Red Wall MP said he was still deciding how to vote and that Mr Buckland’s intervention had caused many of his colleagues to think twice about supporting the Government.

Anyone with a home worth less than £186,000 will be hit with higher care costs under the proposals, analysis carried out by Labour suggests

Anyone with a home worth less than £186,000 will be hit with higher care costs under the proposals, analysis carried out by Labour suggests

Mel Stride (Tory Chairman of the Treasury Committee) has asked that the Chancellor provide a breakdown on how many pensioners would have to sell their houses under the new plans before they vote.

Former health secretary Jeremy Hunt told The Observer it was ‘deeply disappointing’ that the plans were not as progressive as those originally set out by economist Andrew Dilnot.

Former Cabinet minister Damian Green said: ‘I would urge them to adopt a different approach.’

Sajid Javid, Health Secretary, said it is still an improvement over the existing system that has no cost cap and uses a less generous means test.

He told the BBC: ‘No one will have to pay more than £86,000, doesn’t matter who they are, where they live in the country.’

Labour’s health spokesman Jonathan Ashworth urged Red Wall MPs to vote down the proposed amendment to the Care Act today.

He said: ‘Government ministers have not only whacked up tax on working people but are now asking MPs to vote for pensioners across the North and Midlands with modest assets to be hit hardest under Boris Johnson’s care con.

‘We’re calling on Red Wall MPs to put their constituents first and join us in voting down this deeply unfair proposal. Ministers must retreat to the drawing board and come up with a fairer package.’ 

Q&A

Wasn’t social care reform settled months ago?

Boris Johnson finally revealed his long-awaited plan to reform care for the elderly in September, and vowed to end the ‘catastrophic costs’ faced by some pensioners. However, a key detail was revealed last week that makes the system less generous then expected.

What have you noticed?

The main element of the reformed system is a lifetime cap on care costs of £86,000. It had been assumed that the amount local authorities pay towards poorer pensioners’ care would contribute to that total – but the small print published last week reveals that only individuals’ own costs are included.

What is the point?

It means that an elderly person who has to spend a long period in residential care, even if they are receiving financial support from their local council because they have little in savings, will have to put in their own money for a lot longer before they reach the £86,000 cap.

This change will have a major impact on the following:

Experts worry that it could affect less wealthy pensioners. While those who have no savings will get their costs covered, those with houses worth just over £100,000 will get no help and face losing a far larger proportion of their assets than richer pensioners whose houses are worth more.

It has led to Tory rebellion against the government.

Because analysis suggests that voters in the Red Wall seats in the North and Midlands – former Labour supporters who gave Boris Johnson his majority at the last general election – are the most likely to have less valuable homes and therefore face higher costs than expected.

What do you think the Government says?

Ministers maintain that the proposal system is much better than existing arrangements. Long-term care pensioners face nearly unlimited costs under the present arrangement. They also point out that a means test is becoming much more generous, meaning that anyone with £100,000 will now get some help with their costs – up from savings of just £23,250 at present.